Skip to main content

The Candid & Considerate Core Drivers

Learn how the Agreeableness trait is expressed through the Candid and Considerate Core Drivers, including their strengths, risks, and impact on teams.

Updated this week

Candid

The Candid Core Driver reflects the low pole of Agreeableness.

Description

Candid individuals are upfront, straightforward, and less influenced by others’ opinions or emotions. They are socially flexible, competitive, and willing to bend rules to get ahead.

Strengths

  • Direct and to the point in communication

  • Unlikely to be swayed by emotional displays

  • Comfortable making tough decisions

Limitations

  • May appear uncaring or blunt

  • Can be socially clumsy, missing cues or causing offense

  • Risk of creating a perception of coldness

Team and leadership style

Candid individuals often play the role of a “Truth Teller.”

  • Willing to have hard conversations and hold others accountable

  • Focused on cutting through distractions to reach the heart of issues

  • Capable of making tough people decisions without being influenced by emotions

Risk: Colleagues may perceive them as too blunt, and if not managed carefully, their directness can contribute to a toxic culture.


Considerate

The Considerate Core Driver reflects the high pole of Agreeableness.

Description

Considerate individuals are caring, compassionate, and sensitive to others’ feelings. They are humble, altruistic, and often place others’ needs before their own.

Strengths

  • Emotionally aware and empathetic

  • Skilled listeners and tactful communicators

  • Trusted for their ability to maintain relationships and reduce conflict

Limitations

  • May avoid difficult conversations

  • Can beat around the bush instead of being direct

  • Risk of being perceived as conflict-avoidant

Team and leadership style

Considerate individuals often play the role of an “Empathizer.”

  • Focused on building harmony and reducing conflict

  • Cooperative rather than dominant, fostering team cohesion

  • Trusted by teams for their genuine concern for well-being

Risk: They may ignore group tensions or avoid calling out issues, which can weaken their leadership in high-conflict environments.

Did this answer your question?