Skip to main content

The Deeper Signals Capability Model

A science-based framework for measuring and developing social and emotional skills.

Updated this week

Introduction

In the past, learning was once-and-done — people trained for a single career and rarely needed to reskill. Today, rapid scientific and technological change means lifelong learning is essential.

Knowledge alone quickly becomes outdated. What matters most now are meta-skills: the capacity to adapt, learn, and thrive in evolving environments. These include:

  • Knowing how to learn

  • Being able to change one’s mind

  • Harnessing input from others

  • Building social and emotional competencies

Such skills help people:

  1. Cope effectively with life and well-being

  2. Learn and adapt in changing environments

  3. Succeed in the workplace

  4. Build stronger relationships

The OECD defines them as:

“Individual capacities that can be (a) manifested in consistent patterns of thoughts, feelings and behaviours, (b) developed through formal and informal learning experiences, and (c) important drivers of socio-economic outcomes throughout the individual’s life.”

(Chernyshenko, Kankaras & Drasgow, 2018)


Defining a taxonomy of social & emotional skills

The Big Five model of personality (Agreeableness, Conscientiousness, Extraversion, Emotional Stability, and Openness) provides a widely accepted taxonomy for social and emotional skills (Strus & Cieciuch, 2017).

  • Traits are consistent patterns of thinking, feeling, and behaving.

  • Skills are functional capacities — what a person is capable of doing when needed.

The Core Drivers Diagnostic helps individuals gain awareness of their Big Five dimensions through a reliable, valid psychometric tool.

Research consistently links Big Five domains to career success, health, and well-being. For example:

  • Conscientiousness predicts job performance (Roberts et al., 2007; Sackett & Walmsley, 2014).

  • Extraversion predicts leadership and customer service effectiveness (Judge et al., 2002).

  • Openness predicts adaptability and innovation (Marinova et al., 2015).

  • Agreeableness predicts career success (Judge et al., 2012).

  • Emotional Stability predicts resilience and life satisfaction (DeNeve & Cooper, 1998).


Comparative models of social & emotional skills

OECD Model of Social & Emotional Skills

The OECD framework (2021) aligns with the Big Five but focuses on facets rather than broad domains. Facets:

  1. Predict outcomes more accurately

  2. Align better with observable behaviors

  3. Capture nuances hidden by broad traits

  4. Provide a sharper focus for interventions

The OECD identifies 15 key skills across Big Five domains.


Behavioral, Emotional, and Social Skills (BESSI) Inventory

Soto et al. (2022) introduced the BESSI to unify competing models. It defines skills in five domains:

  1. Social Engagement Skills – engaging with others

  2. Cooperation Skills – maintaining positive relationships

  3. Self-Management Skills – achieving goals effectively

  4. Emotional Resilience Skills – regulating emotions

  5. Innovation Skills – embracing new ideas and experiences

These skill domains meaningfully predict academic achievement, occupational interests, social relationships, and well-being.


The Great Eight

Developed by SHL (Kurz & Bartram, 2002), The Great Eight is a work-focused competency model derived from the Big Five.

  • Tier 1: 110 component competencies

  • Tier 2: 20 competency dimensions

  • Tier 3: 8 broad factors (“The Great Eight”)

Validated across organizations, the model shows that variance in competency can be explained by Big Five traits and cognitive ability (Bartram, 2005).


Personality Circumplex of Meta-Traits

[Cieciuch & Strus (2017)] developed a circumplex model combining Big Five traits into eight meta-traits. This approach highlights dynamic interactions and aligns with competency frameworks like BESSI and the Great Eight.


The Deeper Signals Capability Model

Building on these frameworks, Deeper Signals developed a capability model tailored for organizations.

Methodology

  • Competency descriptions from existing models were abstracted by PhD-level psychologists.

  • Independent coding identified overlaps and reduced duplication.

  • Discrepancies were resolved through review.

  • Final competencies were mapped to three organizational levels:

    • Leading Self

    • Leading Others

    • Leading Projects

Capability domains

Table 3: Describing each of the competencies in the Deeper Signals Capability Model

Level

Capability

Description

Leading Self

Self-control

Regulating one's feelings and urges to maintain an even demeanor.

Resilience

Managing stress well and bouncing back from setbacks.

Adapting to Change

Remaining flexible and adaptable as circumstances and people change.

Optimism & Positivity

Remaining upbeat and energized by what is going on.

Persistence & Drive

Showing grit and energy to achieve goals and outcomes.

High Standards

Catching errors, being diligent and sustaining quality.

Accountability

Owning deadlines and accepting responsibility.

Leading Others

Persuading & Influencing

Turning others towards one's own point of view and gaining their commitment to act.

Building networks

Establishing positive relationships with a wide circle.

Building trust

Demonstrating integrity, reliability, and competence.

Customer focus

Wanting to help customers and being considerate of their needs.

Sales focus

Getting people to commit to buy products and services.

Teamwork & Collaboration

Working well with others to achieve a task.

Coaching & Mentoring

Offering feedback and guidance for others to perform better.

Inspiring Others

Creating a picture of a future others want to be part of.

Giving Feedback

Providing a constructive critique of an other’s performance.

Inclusion

Being open to input, collaboration and engagement from anyone, regardless.

Communication

Sharing information in ways that encourage others to listen and hear.

Leading Projects

Planning & Organizing

Being logical, ordered and disciplined when undertaking tasks.

Goal Setting

Setting and striving for a desired outcome or end point.

Leadership

Setting a mission and gaining other's commitment to work together.

Delegating

Assigning tasks and responsibilities to others.

Anticipating Problems

Being alert to issues and risks.

Problem-Solving

Analyzing causes and generating ideas to fix what has gone wrong.

Forming Strategies

Analyzing trends and generating alternate pathways to create advantage.

Learning & Understanding

Adjusting behavior in the light of new information or feedback.

Creating & Innovating

Generating ideas and changing existing approaches or technologies.

Judgement

Making timely decisions on the basis of situational awareness, logic and professional knowledge.


Using the Deeper Signals Capability Model

The Capability Model is powered by the Core Drivers and Core Values diagnostics. Using validated algorithms, we provide organizations with:

  • Employee-level insights: Individual feedback reports and Learning Journeys

  • Team-level analytics: Competency dashboards to highlight gaps and strengths

  • Enterprise-level tools: Custom benchmarks, candidate comparisons, and predictive insights

Customization

If your organization already has a competency model, our psychologists can:

  1. Interview leaders to align with company culture and success factors.

  2. Run a leadership survey keyed to our validated framework.

The result: a customized competency model mapped onto Core Drivers and Core Values, backed by validation research and tested for fairness (no adverse impact across gender, age, or ethnicity).


References

  • Ashton, M. C. (1998). Personality and job performance: The importance of narrow traits. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 19(3), 289-303.

  • Bartram, D. (2005). The Great Eight competencies: a criterion-centric approach to validation. Journal of applied psychology, 90(6), 1185-1203.

  • Chernyshenko, O. S., Kankaraš, M., & Drasgow, F. (2018). Social and emotional skills for student success and well-being: Conceptual framework for the OECD study on social and emotional skills. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.

  • Cieciuch, J., & Strus, W. (2021). Toward a model of personality competencies underlying social and emotional skills: Insight from the Circumplex of Personality Metatraits. Frontiers in Psychology, 4891.

  • DeNeve, K. M., & Cooper, H. (1998). The happy personality: a meta-analysis of 137 personality traits and subjective well-being. Psychological bulletin, 124(2), 197-229.

  • Heckman, J. J., & Kautz, T. (2012). Hard evidence on soft skills. Labour economics, 19(4), 451-464.

  • Hogan, R., Chamorro-Premuzic, T., & Kaiser, R. B. (2013). Employability and career success: Bridging the gap between theory and reality. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 6(1), 3-16.

  • Hurtz, G. M., & Donovan, J. J. (2000). Personality and job performance: The Big Five revisited. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 869–879.

  • Judge, T. A., Bono, J. E., Ilies, R., & Gerhardt, M. W. (2002). Personality and leadership: a qualitative and quantitative review. Journal of applied psychology, 87(4), 765-780.

  • Judge, T. A., Livingston, B. A., & Hurst, C. (2012). Do nice guys—and gals—really finish last? The joint effects of sex and agreeableness on income. Journal of personality and social psychology, 102(2), 390-407.

  • Kurz, R., & Bartram, D. (2002). Competency and individual performance: Modelling the world of work. Organizational effectiveness: The role of psychology, 227-255.

  • Lippman, L. H., Ryberg, R., Carney, R., & Moore, K. A. (2015). Workforce Connections: Key “soft skills” that foster youth workforce success: toward a consensus across fields. Washington, DC: Child Trends.

  • Marinova, S. V., Peng, C., Lorinkova, N., Van Dyne, L., & Chiaburu, D. (2015). Change-oriented behavior: A meta-analysis of individual and job design predictors. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 88, 104-120.

  • Organisation for economic co-operation and development. (2021). Beyond academic learning first results from the survey of social and emotional skills. OCED.

  • Roberts, B. W., Kuncel, N. R., Shiner, R., Caspi, A., & Goldberg, L. R. (2007). The Power of Personality. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2(4), 313–345.

  • Soto, C. J., Napolitano, C. M., & Roberts, B. W. (2021). Taking skills seriously: Toward an integrative model and agenda for social, emotional, and behavioral skills. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 30(1), 26-33.

  • Strus, W., & Cieciuch, J. (2017). Towards a synthesis of personality, temperament, motivation, emotion and mental health models within the Circumplex of Personality Metatraits. Journal of Research in Personality, 66, 70-95.

  • Tackett, J. L. (2006). Evaluating models of the personality–psychopathology relationship in children and adolescents. Clinical Psychology Review, 26(5), 584-599.

Did this answer your question?